Bicester MOD migrant camp

Bicester is set to welcome hundreds of migrant men into their town, and given the political leanings of the town, you would expect them to be happy.

However, despite their “refugees welcome” stance and political leaning towards parties which seemingly support unchecked immigration, they don’t seem very happy.

How Bicester votes

No matter how you cut it, across Bicester’s MP, county, district and town, it is clear to see the left-leaning bias, with Lib Dems making up the majority, supplemented with Greens and a number of Independents, some of whom are ex Lib/Lab anyway.

Note - counts are seats/roles, not unique as several people hold more than one role. A more detailed breakdown: Bicester political roles and party makeup.

We could argue about the Conservatives, but despite how they protest their supposed right-leaning position, their previous actions speak volumes and their actions have been supportive of this agenda.

The irony

You would think with this political makeup the local majority would be opening their arms and unfurling their “welcome” banners; however, this appears not to be the case.

People are somewhat up in arms about the government’s decision, and to be fair they argue that camps are not the right approach, but at the same time, they aren’t exactly welcoming these people into their homes: in fact, they don’t seem to have a solution.

Many of the people who support this agenda signed an open letter to “forge a new path for asylum seekers and refugees in the UK”. I wonder how many welcomed someone into their neighbourhood, never mind their home?

The problem with democracy

The problem with democracy is that you get the society you deserve.

On the whole, the direct impact on the virtue-signalling left-leaning “do-gooders” has been limited, but we’re reaching a point in this country where the problem is too hard to ignore. It’s so blindingly obvious.

Of course, there are the die-hards, and those who will never admit they are wrong, but increasingly people are aware there is a problem: it isn’t going away; in fact, it is only getting worse. Every day now we hear another horror story resulting from these failed policies.

Perhaps further indictment is that the latest “local man”, who got a bit confused about our culture and went on a rampage due to “mental health” issues, is turning out to be a second-generation immigrant.

So now we have a generation of failed policies and people to address.

Where does it end?

We are at the point where our benefits bill is greater than our income tax receipts, and not only are we failing to support our own, but we pretend we can import the entire third world on a dwindling budget.

How many more? How many is too many? How will we support them? When will they integrate, let alone contribute? These questions go unanswered, deflected with mindless rhetoric…

“We are a nation of immigrants”

Yes, and that is the problem … how is this sustainable?

Despite government and media protest / gaslighting, the observable reality on the street is too hard to ignore. Demographics have shifted wildly in recent years, towns and cities are on the downfall, the streets feel less safe and not only is there no end in sight, it is clearly on a downward trajectory.

The solution?

Our problems don’t stem from rich people, and no amount of taxation will fix this.

We need to better gate access to society and only allow people to stay where there is cultural parity or a willingness to integrate, clearly demonstrated, with a meaningful contribution.

• Start by locking up / deporting criminals (foreign and domestic). This would be the fastest route to improve people’s lives. No more early release, lenient sentences or catch and release. If the jails are full, we’ll stack them up, it’s not a holiday camp. The worst offenders can be put to death or sent to El Salvador to see out the rest of their days.
• Anyone who entered the country illegally can be given the opportunity to leave; otherwise they are detained and deported, without further debate or discussion. If necessary, deals with countries such as El Salvador can be struck to house them until they remember their identity and where they came from.
• Then focus on those who may have entered legally but have failed to integrate or contribute to society in a meaningful manner. If you come here and need special privileges, permissions, cut-outs or benefits, then Britain is not the place for you.
• Tough regulation and taxes for hiring overseas workers. If you can only exist exploiting foreign labour enmasse, then there is something wrong with your business and you either need to change or close.

Make no mistake, this is the moderate position.

Times will be tough, there will adjustments in labour markets, rebalancing of economies, and societal adjustments to make, but if we want to preserve our country and herritage it is absolutely necessary.

What is clear is that if we continue down the current path, it doesn’t bear thinking about; history has a tendency to repeat and it’s not pretty.

A wake-up call?

Perhaps recent events are a wake-up call?

Despite Labour getting a slight bounce in the polls, due to the latest puppet being installed, this dead-cat bounce won’t last. The destruction of our towns, cities and now villages will continue, until there is nothing left of what once was.

Some clearly want this, but I imagine the majority do not. Perhaps some are ideologically captured or fearful to speak out, but times are changing, and people need to see that over the coming years, if something doesn’t happen to counter it, we will reach a point of no return.

Ironically, at some point, Eastern Europe may be the last countries still standing for white Europeans, and maybe we’ll be the ones seeking asylum, perhaps in Russia.

References

• Bicester political roles and party makeup
• MoD Bicester (site A), Oxfordshire: factsheet
• Open letter to forge a new path for asylum seekers and refugees in the UK
• LibDems - Stop Plans to Use MOD Bicester for Asylum Accommodation